NSAC's Blog

A Closer Look at the 2018 Farm Bill: Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program

January 24, 2019

Joney O'Hare uses Saturday Morning Market tokens to pay for some of her purchase that was funded with her U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits at the Saturday Morning Market, in St. Petersburg, FL on April 14, 2012. Worden Farm (www.wordenfarm.com) says, “We at Worden Farm are happy to work with the USDA SNAP  The tokens are exchanged with vendors for food, food producing plants or seeds for food producing plants as wanted and available. Vendors then returned to the tokens to the market organizer for an equal dollar amount that is electronically deposited into the vendor’s bank account. Worden Farm is a family farm that provides certified organic produce to Southwest Florida through community supported agriculture (CSA) membership programs and retail sale at several farmer’s (community) markets. Depending on the state, EBT cards can also hold value from other food and nutrition partners that can add a certain value or provide a certain degree of match to the value of other programs add to the card. USDA Photo by Lance Cheung.
Customer using Saturday Morning Market tokens to pay for some of her purchase, the tokens are funded by USDA’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Photo credit: USDA, Lance Cheung.

Editor’s Note: This is the third post in a multi-part blog series digging deeper into some of the programs and policies of the 2018 Farm Bill. These posts will detail how the new farm bill is likely to impact core sustainable agriculture programs administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Previous posts focused on: working lands conservation and local/regional food programs. Our final post of the series will focus on beginning/socially disadvantaged farmers. This blog is a guest post written by Kate Fitzgerald for Fair Food Network, an NSAC member organization.

In the eyes of healthy food system advocates, one of the 2018 Farm Bill’s biggest successes is the expansion of the Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive program (FINI); the SNAP incentive grant program established in the 2014 Farm Bill that has continued to garner bipartisan and bicameral support. The program was recently renamed in honor of longtime friend to the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC), former USDA Under Secretary, and Wholesome Wave co-founder Gus Schumacher, who was lauded in the conference committee report as “a magnificent advocate for farmers and families (who) saw the importance in building access and affordability through incentive programs.” The many NSAC member groups conducting incentive programs can attest to the truth of the statement.

The new and improved Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (which we will refer to as “FINI” here for simplicity’s sake) is funded at $250 million a year for 5 years, making it a permanent part of future farm bills . FINI is administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA).

While the new FINI program continues the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) incentive grants program, it integrates some new program improvements that are a direct result of feedback from NSAC members and other FINI grantees. This includes new funding for technical assistance, information sharing, and a simplified reporting system, as well as the addition of a produce prescription provision originally proposed as a stand-alone program in the Local FARMS Act.

Program Details

SNAP Incentives:

Competitive grants for SNAP point-of-sale fruit and vegetable incentives have total funding of up to $187 million in fiscal year 2019 through fiscal year 2023. These grants can go to public or nonprofit organizations and require a 50 percent non-federal cash or in-kind match.

Produce Prescriptions:  

Competitive grants for programs that provide “prescriptions” to encourage produce consumption through financial, educational, or other incentives will receive a maximum of $25 million over 5 years. These do not require a 50% non-federal match, but do need coordination with healthcare providers, and data collection to assess whether the approach can reduce healthcare spending.

Technical Assistance & Reporting:  

There is a total of $38 million over 5 years to establish training, technical assistance, information, and evaluation center(s). The goal of these is to:

  •  Develop and disseminate of best practices.
  • Provide intensive support for programs in high-need areas.
  • Coordinate among incentive practitioners, point of sale and electronic payment companies, grocers and farm direct retailers, and federal and state SNAP agencies on the development and sharing of improved and cost-effective SNAP and incentive transaction systems. 
  • Develop a centralized hub for the reporting of standardized program data to reduce duplication and ensure consistent information collection. The information will be used for annual reporting to Congress and USDA and will be publicly searchable in a way that will facilitate connections between programs and further research in the field. The USDA Secretary is encouraged to consult with a range of stakeholders and former grantees on the design and implementation of the training, TA, information and evaluation center(s).

FINI continues to emphasize a link to local and regional agriculture and direct marketing. It also supports programs in tribal communities by allowing Indian Health Service funds to be used as match and expands the program to include Puerto Rico, which receives a block grant instead of SNAP. Finally, it reduces grantee administration substantially by streamlining reporting and facilitating coordination to solve common challenges and share technological solutions.

What’s Next?

The implementation timeline for the new FINI program remains a mystery. The government shutdown has stalled any progress on deciding how the produce prescription grants will be administered, gathering feedback for the new support centers, or developing a bidding process to award those funds. In addition, the lion’s share of the FINI program implementation is done by NIFA staff so the uncertainty created by the USDA Secretary’s desire to move the agency out of Washington DC may slow the process even more.

Regardless the expanded FINI program remains a serious win in the 2018 Farm Bill for families and farmers, and speaks to the power of practitioners sharing the real successes such programs are having in communities nationwide.

Categories: Farm Bill, Local & Regional Food Systems, Nutrition & Food Access

Comments are closed.