November 30, 2010
Friday Update to this story: Once the Senate-passed bill reached the House this week, a new problem emerged. The House claimed its right to be the originator of all bills with revenue provisions (in this case user fees that food companies would pay to help offset the costs of food recalls). Instead of simply passing the Senate bill and sending it to the President to become law, the House is opting instead to pass the Senate bill but attach it to another must-pass piece of legislation and send the two-bill package, now with a House bill number rather than a Senate bill number, back to the Senate for final consideration. Once the Senate passes the combined bill, it would go to the President for his signature.
The insistence by the House on this elaborate game of legislative ping-pong fell prey to yet another problem in the Senate. Senate Republicans have decided to block consideration of all bills until a final deal is struck on legislation to extend the Bush-era tax cuts and to punt this fiscal year’s appropriations bills down the field until early next year. As a result, Senate consideration of the food safety bill, once it arrives from the House, will likely have to wait until all the major unfinished legislative pieces are ready to move either as a coordinated set of actions or as an omnibus measure of some kind.
All of this has made the path for the Senate food safety bill to become law more complicated and a bit delayed, but hopefully will not jeopardize the bill becoming law after clearing all of these roadblocks and hurdles.
On Tuesday, November 30, a year after it was reported out of Committee, the Food Safety Modernization Act (S.510) passed the Senate, 73-25.
The bill will now be sent to the House for their consideration. The House passed its own food safety bill (HR.2749) last year, but given the short time remaining in this Congress, it would be extremely difficult to go through a conference between the House and Senate and then bring a conference bill back to both bodies for another vote. The only way to get the bill finished and signed into law is for the House to adopt the Senate bill and send it to the President.
The bill, which will require improved planning and record-keeping by food producers and processors and will allow the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to make mandatory recalls of contaminated food, marks the most sweeping overhaul of food safety regulations in nearly a century.
The final Senate bill includes six amendments that were worked on by NSAC and that each became part of the Manager’s amendment that the Senate has now approved. Those include the amendments championed by:
Debate over the Tester-Hagan amendment consumed much of the final two weeks of action on the bill. An accord between consumer groups who had originally opposed the amendment and sustainable agriculture groups who supported it helped clear the way to a bipartisan deal to incorporate the brokered provision into the Manager’s amendment and thus into the final bill.
Despite a fierce attack from produce and meat industry trade associations opposing passage of the bill with the Tester-Hagan language included, the Senate passed two cloture motions as well as final passage of the bill with just one-quarter of the Senate voting no.
After the Manager’s Amendment was approved last night, the Senate voted down four other amendments, including two amendments related to the health care bill, a proposed 3-year moratorium on congressional earmarking, and a substitute food safety bill introduced by Senator Coburn (R-OK).
The bill still faces the hurdle of final House action. Top House Democrats have agreed to consider passing the Senate version to avoid lengthy reconciliation negotiations that would prevent the bill from becoming law and force the next Congress to start the entire process from scratch.
NSAC issued a press release following the Senate vote urging speedy House action to approve the Senate bill and send it on to the President for his signature.
Categories: Food Safety
Why were the produce and meat industry trade associations opposed to the Managers Amendment?
Is there a list of the groups who opposed the amendment?
These trade associations represent, for the most part, large growers, who see the exemption from certain S.510 requirements granted to small, direct marketing operations as a competitive advantage for small farms. They’d rather see the regulations applied across all operations – though of course this would place a disproportionate burden on the smaller producers.
Here is the link to the letter to the Senate from the groups opposed to the Tester amendment.
Are there significant differences between this Senate bill and the bill the house passed last year?
The problem I have with the FDA is that its one big organization that’s in charge of regulating a hell of a lot of things, which is bad for them and bad for the people its built to protect; higher potential for foul-ups, in my opinion.
In Canada (I’m doing this research on-the-fly, so bear with me) we have separate departments for everything, it seems. Food is regulated by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, drugs and dangerous product recalls by Health Canada, etc.
The House bill would impose a one-size-fits-all set of rules suited to large scale farms and processors. In addition to the expense of compliance, small and mid sized farmers would be socked with a flat (one-size-fits-all) fee to pay for FDA oversight.
[…] on behalf of local farmers and ranchers as the bill is considered in the House. Read more from the National Coalition for Sustainable Agriculture and the Washington […]
* Most cases of food poisoning are found to come from Large operations
* Large operations push their agenda through this bill to punish and hopefully eliminate small farms
* Only when small and worse yet organic farms are eliminated will we be truly safe
anyone else genuinely scared?
RT @farmtotablefood: Senate passes food safety bill. Exempts small farmers from most onerous partshttp://tinyurl.com/3yvkzuc
[…] Natural News National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition December 3rd, 2010 | Tags: food safety | Category: Policy and […]
[…] Update, 12/6/2010: While consumers everywhere should be glad that this bill passed with all small farm protection amendments intact, there is still a lot of steps for it to become a law in this lame duck session of Congress, and time may run out before it happens. National Sustainable Ag Coalition explains. […]
[…] of small and mid-sized family farms, local and regional food, and conservation. Since the Senate passed its bill, trade associations representing produce industry and agribusiness interests have been hammering […]