• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Supporting the economic and environmental sustainability of agriculture, natural resources, and rural communities.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Work
  • Publications
  • Press
  • Take Action!
  • Blog
  • Donate

Search National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Bill Summary

Bill Summary

The Farm Program Integrity Act of 2013 (S.281, H.R.1932) is being championed in the Senate by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Mike Enzi (R-WY), and Sherrod Brown (D-OH), and in the House by Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE). A brief summary of the bill follows.

Legislative Background

The Farm Program Integrity Act (FPIA) is patterned very closely on previous versions of the same bill offered by Sen. Grassley, and co-sponsored for many years by former Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) and in the 111th Congress by former Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI). The Dorgan-Grassley bill won strong majority bipartisan support on the Senate floor in each of the past two farm bill debates (2002 and 2008), but did not in either instance become part of the final farm bill adopted into law. Those two farm bills, however, added new spending to the farm bill coffers, whereas the current Farm Bill under negotiation is expected to require significant spending reductions, increasing the likelihood for the inclusion of payment reform in the final product.  The Senate did adopt these payment limitation reforms in the final farm bill approved on the Senate floor, but the House Agriculture Committee did not include any of these common sense reforms in their version of the bill that was voted out of committee last year.

Bill Summary

FPIA has two major provisions that, if enacted, would lower the per farm cap on farm commodity program payments and ensure that federal farm payments flow to working farmers.

Part One: Reduce Farm Program Payment Limits

The bill would reduce the cap on commodity payments that any one farm receives to $250,000 per year. This would be achieved by reducing the following payment limits for a married farm couple:

  • Total of all title I program payments, including direct payments (if continued in the next farm bill), counter-cyclical payments, acreage crop revenue election payments, and any new form of price or revenue-triggered commodity payments included in the next farm bill, from $210,000 to $100,000
  • Marketing loan gains and loan deficiency payments from no limit at all to $150,000

Commodity Payment

(see note below chart)

Current Limit

(per individual)

FPIA, House & Senate Farm Bill Limit

(per individual)

Current Limit

(per married couple)

FPIA, House & Senate Farm Bill Limit

(per married couple)

Direct payments

$40,000

$50,000

$80,000

$100,000

Counter-cyclical payments/Acreage crop revenue election payments

$65,000

$130,000

New price or revenue triggered payments in next farm bill

Not applicable

Not applicable

Marketing loan gains
Loan deficiency payments

No limit

$75,000

No limit

$150,000

TOTAL PAYMENTS

No limit

$125,000

No limit

$250,000

Note – We assume that direct payments will be discontinued in the farm bill reauthorization. If they are continued, FPIA would place a cap of $50,000 on any combination of payments that include direct, counter-cyclical, ACRE, or any new price or revenue triggered payment.

Part Two: Close Payment Loopholes

The bill would also close existing loopholes that allow mega farms to collect far higher payments than current law would otherwise seem to allow. Current law requires a contribution of 1,000 hours of labor on the farm or involvement in its management in order to receive farm payments. However, the vague and largely unenforceable regulatory standard for “actively managing” farm operations has foiled lawmakers’ attempts to target payments to working farmers.

The provisions in this bill would force USDA to adopt a measurable standard to determine whether recipients are actively engaged in farming and clarify the definition of management to require ongoing and direct involvement in farm activities to stop the current evasion of payment limits. Landowners who share rent land to an actively-engaged producer and producers serving as the sole manager of a farming operation or the primary manager for their share of a multi-family operation would also be considered to be actively engaged. Closing the current management loophole is widely viewed by commodity program and legal experts as the linchpin to any attempt to stop current abusive practices that allow mega farms to receive millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies.

All members of congress are invited to co-sponsor the Farm Program Integrity Act.  Please contact Andrew Brandt in Sen. Grassley’s office at (202) 224-3744 or Alan Feyerherm in Rep. Fortenberry’s office at (202) 225-4806.

To download a PDF of this summary, click here.

Primary Sidebar

  • CAMPAIGNS
  • NSAC's Response to
    and Resources for COVID-19
  • ISSUES

Categories

  • Action Alerts
  • Beginning and Minority Farmers
  • Budget and Appropriations
  • Carousel
  • Climate Change
  • Commodity, Crop Insurance & Credit Programs
  • Competition & Anti-trust
  • Conservation, Energy & Environment
  • Coronavirus
  • Farm Bill
  • Food Safety
  • General Interest
  • Grants and Programs
  • Implementation & Rule-making
  • Local & Regional Food Systems
  • Marketing and Labeling
  • NSAC Coalition
  • Nutrition & Food Access
  • Organic
  • Press Comment
  • Press Releases
  • Research, Education & Extension
  • Rural Development
  • Sustainable Livestock

Take Action

What's happening right now »

Subscribe for Updates

Footer

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
110 Maryland Avenue NE, Suite 209 Washington, DC 20002
Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 · National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design